{"id":3346,"date":"2020-05-04T09:42:24","date_gmt":"2020-05-04T08:42:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=3346"},"modified":"2022-11-11T12:29:20","modified_gmt":"2022-11-11T11:29:20","slug":"examination","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=3346","title":{"rendered":"Examination"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<pre class=\"wp-block-verse has-text-align-right\">\"Every man has the right to have his ideas<br>examined one at a time.\" (Ezra Pound)<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<p>Even very established scholars sometimes describe themselves as &#8220;students of&#8221; their subjects. This isn&#8217;t an expression of (even false) humility; they are merely acknowledging that they &#8220;study&#8221; things. Something similar can be said of words like &#8220;test&#8221; and &#8220;examine&#8221;, which can be applied both to people and to ideas. At first pass, these seem to be radically different senses of &#8220;student&#8221; and &#8220;examine&#8221;, but I think it&#8217;s worth noting their connections. Students and scholars are, after all, engaged in the same cultural activity, namely, &#8220;learning.&#8221; Though here, again, we&#8217;re tempted to say that the word is used in two very different senses, I think it&#8217;s important to keep in mind that, not only is our instruction based on our scholarship, we are, in part, instructing our students in the craft of scholarship. Examination is an integral part of academic life, even when it&#8217;s not part of the process of assigning a grade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That said, I sometimes suspect that scholars resent the exam-like conditions of, for example, the peer-review process. While it makes sense to want to put &#8220;school&#8221; behind you, that desire is easier for people who leave the university (for one of the professions or the arts or anything else) to declare than it is for academics to wanly announce. In fact, academics ideally chose their career path because they genuinely respect the exam situation. We might say that the university ought to attract people who, precisely, <em>don&#8217;t resent examination<\/em>, i.e., people who see the value of testing the knowledge of someone whose job it is to know things. The deepest way of addressing this problem, then, is to explain why no one, not even a student, should resent being examined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Why are exams a good thing?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We can begin with the easy cases. We want our doctors to know what they&#8217;re doing. We want them to get very good educations, and we want their licenses to practice medicine to depend on this education. We&#8217;re not satisfied with their merely getting into, or even dutifully attending, medical school. We want to know that they actually learned what their teachers were trying to teach them. So we expect those teachers to <em>examine<\/em> our future doctors&#8217; understanding of the current state of medical knowledge. These days, many of us are discovering (some of us, to our surprise) the depth of our respect for medicine, and this implies a respect for the institutions that train our medical professionals. We believe that they&#8217;ve done a good job of ensuring that the people who treat us when we are ill know what they&#8217;re doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is why I don&#8217;t like it when established academics side with students who <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=2114\">&#8220;hate school&#8221;<\/a> (allegedly out of their &#8220;love of learning&#8221;). It&#8217;s perfectly legitimate, and often no doubt reasonable, to dislike going to school. All social institutions are imperfect, and none can fulfill its mission entirely without some residual nuisance and boredom, but higher education is for people who have actively put up with those imperfections for the sake of a greater goal, indeed, a <em>higher<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=2315\">purpose<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Testing a student is merely a somewhat artificial instance of testing ideas. Ezra Pound invoked his &#8220;right&#8221; to have his ideas tested (he had his reasons), but there is also, among academics in any case, a <em>duty<\/em> to let them be tested. At the limit, we might posit a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_unexamined_life_is_not_worth_living\">Socratic<\/a> duty to oneself to examine one&#8217;s own ideas, lest one&#8217;s own life be not worth living. But, as I reminded us above, the unexamined doctor is certainly not worthy of a medical practice. Highly educated professionals deserve our respect because they once allowed themselves to be examined by people who were qualified to tell them they were wrong. <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=2155\">Academics<\/a>, I never tire of saying, are people who are permanently committed to <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=2563\">this regime<\/a> of &#8220;testing&#8221; by their peers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Every man has the right to have his ideasexamined one at a time.&#8221; (Ezra Pound) Even very established scholars sometimes describe themselves as &#8220;students of&#8221; their subjects. This isn&#8217;t an expression of (even false) humility; they are merely acknowledging that they &#8220;study&#8221; things. Something similar can be said of words like &#8220;test&#8221; and &#8220;examine&#8221;, which &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=3346\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Examination<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3346"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3346\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5789,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3346\/revisions\/5789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}