{"id":521,"date":"2017-03-23T11:57:30","date_gmt":"2017-03-23T10:57:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=521"},"modified":"2018-05-14T10:03:26","modified_gmt":"2018-05-14T09:03:26","slug":"hot-takes-and-cool-reason","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=521","title":{"rendered":"The Prose Effect"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>People sometimes discern an almost religious fervor in my writing advice. It is true that I believe in better living through better writing. Indeed, I think better prose makes the world a better place. I don&#8217;t mean this quite in the sense of the so-called <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transcendental_Meditation#Maharishi_Effect\">Maharishi Effect<\/a>, i.e., in the sense that better prose might have some direct influence on the state of the world, but I do believe it in the sense that is probably the real basis for belief in such an effect.<\/p>\n<p>The Maharishi Effect is usually described as a paranormal one: if 1% of the people living in a certain area practice transcendental meditation then this will have some positive effect on the surrounding environment. I suspect that if there is any measurable effect then it stems from the pleasantness that the meditators spread throughout the community, not on some occult force.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that the same thing is true of conscientious writers. People who &#8220;sit down&#8221; every day to write carefully formed prose paragraphs about things they know don&#8217;t have a direct, magical effect on the state of discourse. But their writing and their reading will be &#8220;stronger&#8221; than it might otherwise be and will therefore pull discourse in the direction of rigor and clarity. You don&#8217;t need<em> everyone<\/em> to articulate their ideas in paragraphs of at least six sentences and at most two-hundred words, composed 27 minutes at a time. But I think it is worrisome to imagine a world in which\u00a0<em>no one\u00a0<\/em>does it&#8211;a world in which everyone throws together their ideas in tweets and quickly written Facebook posts, always as a reaction to some current event, not on the basis of some well-established fact.<\/p>\n<p>Those reactions, what are sometimes called &#8220;hot takes&#8221;, do of course have a place in discourse. But that place is granted precisely within the context of more permanent expressions of stable fact. If we really do live in a &#8220;post-factual&#8221; society, it is because our hot takes never run into anything but other hot takes. They don&#8217;t encounter the cool azure of reason.<\/p>\n<p>To return to my analogy: if 1% of a population is meditating, then they bring a particular calmness with them into the hustle and bustle of the day-to-day. When emotions run &#8220;hot&#8221;, they encounter these people and are soothed. Likewise, outraged Tweets need to run into the moderating force of a well-crafted paragraph. This will make everyone think and feel more clearly about the matter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>People sometimes discern an almost religious fervor in my writing advice. It is true that I believe in better living through better writing. Indeed, I think better prose makes the world a better place. I don&#8217;t mean this quite in the sense of the so-called Maharishi Effect, i.e., in the sense that better prose might &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=521\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Prose Effect<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=521"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/521\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":524,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/521\/revisions\/524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}