{"id":5729,"date":"2022-11-11T10:04:46","date_gmt":"2022-11-11T09:04:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5729"},"modified":"2022-11-30T16:38:43","modified_gmt":"2022-11-30T15:38:43","slug":"will-ai-disrupt-the-essay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5729","title":{"rendered":"Will AI Disrupt the Essay?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>My title is inspired by <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EnglishOER\/status\/1586487891483496448\">Anna Mill&#8217;s thought-provoking Twitter thread<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/charlesknight.co.uk\/\">Charles Knight<\/a>&#8216;s excellent reflections on the potential of large language models to undermine &#8220;the integrity of the essay&#8221;.  If you don&#8217;t know anything about the issue that this experiment is addressing, then I highly recommend watching his talk first (embedded below). I agree with him that artificial intelligence can (and will) be used to &#8220;attack&#8221; the essay as a core competence of students and scholars. (See <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Marc__Watkins\/status\/1590881219042234368\">a recent tweet by Marc Watkins <\/a>if you&#8217;re in any doubt about what&#8217;s coming.) It will certainly force us to assign more essays in-class to ensure that the students we&#8217;re giving university degrees to can actually write sentences about their subject. (See <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/X715QDykxl8\">Charles&#8217;s follow-up reflections here<\/a> on that question.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"AI 1 - AI and essays -  threat or menace?\" width=\"604\" height=\"340\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/u0mwtx49y_M?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Charles Knight&#8217;s talk on the question, &#8220;How could AI break the integrity of the essay?&#8221;<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Anyway &#8230; I produced the 900-word essay below <strong>in ten minutes<\/strong> of messing around (lying on my sofa before dinner) with GPT-3. The bolded sentences are my contribution. The only other contribution was to gather loose sentences together into paragraphs (until GPT-3 caught on that I wanted paragraphs). I have not changed the order of any of the sentences or words. (See my earlier experiments <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5378\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"5378\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5386\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"5386\">here<\/a>.) Note: <strong>I mean ten minutes literally. That is all it took.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I didn&#8217;t begin with the title but with the first key sentence (except that I added the in-text citations at the end of the process). At the start, the results came somewhat haltingly, two or three sentences at a time, hence the more frequent prompting. Adding the title seemed to inspire more essay-like results. And once it had generated the four factors, and I had prompted it to go through them, I was able to get the rest simply by resubmitting the whole text as a prompt twice. After the text had been completed, I added the in-line references (I made up the dates for for Friedman, Galbraith, and Krugman, and have no idea what I meant by &#8220;Jones 2010&#8221; and &#8220;Smith 2012&#8221;) and then prompted it one last time by writing &#8220;References&#8221; at the end. Except for some oddly placed spaces, which I have removed, it produced the reference list exactly as posted below. (Yes, do check those references out!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I post it here without further comment, though I&#8217;ll probably repost an annotated version at some point. I&#8217;d love  to hear what you think of it, both in terms of style and content. Imagine that a student submitted this as an answer to a relevant prompt (e.g., &#8220;Write 500-1000-word essay about the causes of the Great Depression&#8221;). Suppose you could be certain that it was <strong>not<\/strong> autogenerated or plagiarized (i.e., that was actually written by a student who had been given, say, <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=2715\">72 hours<\/a> to write it). What grade would you give it? I imagine it depends on what class you imagine you&#8217;re teaching. Imagine getting this from a first-year economics student, or perhaps a history student, or a student in your freshman composition course. How good is it? Be honest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Please post your reflections in the comments. for my part, I think it&#8217;s a great example of the potential of AI to <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5403\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"5403\">&#8220;automate the C&#8221;<\/a>. Preventing this will indeed &#8220;disrupt&#8221; our educational practices in higher education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted\"><strong>The Causes of the Great Depression: An Economic Perspective\n<\/strong>\n<strong>Milton Friedman (1964) and J.K. Galbraith (1972) had very different views of the great depression.<\/strong> Friedman believed that the great depression was caused by the Federal Reserve's policy of not providing enough money to banks. Galbraith believed that the great depression was caused by a lack of demand for goods and services. <strong>This was debated for many years by subsequent economists.<\/strong> Friedman's view is generally accepted by most economists today, while Galbraith's view has been largely discredited. <strong>But recently interest in Galbraith's position has rekindled.<\/strong>\n\nSome economists <strong>(Krugman 1992; Jones 2010)<\/strong> now believe that both Friedman and Galbraith were partially right, and that the great depression was caused by a combination of factors. They point to the fact that after the stock market crash of 1929, there was a severe lack of demand for goods and services. This led to a decrease in production and an increase in unemployment. At the same time, they argue that the Federal Reserve's policy of not providing enough money to banks contributed to the problem. This made it difficult for banks to lend money, which further decreased demand and added to the problem of unemployment.\n\n<strong>The financial crisis of 2007-2008 brought things to a head.<\/strong> The bursting of the housing bubble and the resulting increase in foreclosures led to a decrease in demand for goods and services. This, combined with the Federal Reserve's policy of keeping interest rates low, led to a decrease in production and an increase in unemployment. The result was the Great Recession, which is often compared to the Great Depression.\n\nThere are a number of other factors that may have contributed to the Great Depression. These include:\n\nThe high level of debt that consumers and businesses were carrying;\n\nThe increasing international trade imbalances;\n\nThe over-extension of credit by banks; and,\n\nThe stock market speculation that preceded the crash.\n\n<strong>In this essay, I will look at each of these factors in turn.<\/strong>\n\n<strong>First, then,<\/strong> let's look at the question of debt. In 1929, consumers and businesses were carrying a high level of debt. This was partly due to the easy credit that was available at the time. Consumers were able to buy cars and houses on installment plans, and businesses could borrow money for expansion. The problem was that when people lose their jobs or their income decreases, they have trouble making their loan payments. This can lead to defaults and foreclosures, which further reduces demand and contributes to unemployment.\n\nSecond, international trade imbalances also played a role in the Great Depression. Before World War 1, Europe had been the dominant economic power. But after the war, America became the leading economic power. America had more money than it needed, while Europe struggled with heavy debts from the war. To repay these debts, European nations began borrowing money from America. As a result, America began accumulating large amounts of foreign debt.\n\nThis situation came to a head in 1929 when an American stock market crash led to a decrease in demand for European goods. To make matters worse, American banks started calling in their loans to European nations (a process known as \"contraction\"). This led to a decrease in production and an increase in unemployment in Europe - which further decreased demand for American goods! The combination of these factors led to a sharp decline in international trade - which made things worse for everyone involved.\n\nThird, banks also played a role in causing the Great Depression by extending too much credit before 1929 . When people are given easy access to credit , they tend to spend more than they would otherwise . This can lead to an increase in demand for goods and services , which can lead to inflation . In the years before 1929, banks were lending money to people who wanted to buy stocks . This led to an increase in stock prices , which encouraged more borrowing and more speculation . When the stock market crashed in October 1929, many people were left with worthless stocks and large debts . This led to a decrease in demand for goods and services , which further contributed to the problem of unemployment.\n\nFourth, it has been argued <strong>(Smith 2012)<\/strong> that the Great Depression was caused by a lack of aggregate demand. Keynesian economics argues that total spending (or aggregate demand) is what drives economic activity. If there is not enough total spending, then production will decrease and unemployment will rise. One reason why there may have been a lack of aggregate demand in the early 1930s was because of the high level of debt that consumers and businesses were carrying. Another reason was the international trade imbalances mentioned above. When countries are not buying American goods, this reduces American exports - leading to a decline in production and jobs.\n\nSo, what can we learn from all this? First, it is important to remember that economic recessions and depressions are complex phenomena with many causes. Second, we should be careful about using monetary policy (interest rates) as our only tool for dealing with recessions and depressions - as Friedman <strong>(1964, 1968) <\/strong>argued. Third, we should be aware of other factors that can contribute to these problems - such as excessive debt levels or international trade imbalances. And fourth, we should always be prepared for potential downturns by having strong financial systems in place - such as banking regulations or social safety nets.\n\n<strong>References<\/strong>\n\nFriedman, M. (1964). Money and economic development: The Horowitz lectures of 1957. New York: Praeger.\n\nFriedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.\n\nGalbraith, J.K. (1972). Economics and the public purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. \n\nJones, C. (2010) Galbraith on the great crash revisited. Challenge, 53(2), 17-40. \n\nKrugman, P. (1992) It's Baaack: Japan's Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 137-205. \n\nSmith, A. (2012) What caused the Great Depression? Econ Journal Watch 9 (3):449-469.<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My title is inspired by Anna Mill&#8217;s thought-provoking Twitter thread and Charles Knight&#8216;s excellent reflections on the potential of large language models to undermine &#8220;the integrity of the essay&#8221;. If you don&#8217;t know anything about the issue that this experiment is addressing, then I highly recommend watching his talk first (embedded below). I agree with &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/?p=5729\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Will AI Disrupt the Essay?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5729"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5729\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5861,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5729\/revisions\/5861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inframethodology.cbs.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}